Popularity is fickle

| 0 Comments

The popularity of a given next generation technology is very fickle, and its success or failure depends on many random and unexpected events independent of what logical reasoning would lead us to choose.

The best does not necessarily beat all, and the final winner is usually not by definition the best solution for mankind. More often than not it is the lucky player who takes home all of the chips hands down.

In the end we unknowingly become locked into this randomly chosen technology whether we like it or not. Thanks to a couple of extremely rich lucky winners.

Nature throws a bunch of random events our way. The fittest techies are the species that survives, has more children and spreads the geeky DNA all over the place.

There must be a better way, or not?

Leave a comment

Recent Entries

Clojure one-liner
I am convinced that the new programming language called Clojure has alot of potential and if successful will fundamentally ... »
Trusting yourself
An excellent book that I've been reading is called Management 3.0 by Jurgen Appelo. The book has all kinds ... »
Remembering and then forgetting
There is that last fleeting moment right before you fall asleep when your mind empties of all thought and ... »
Zuma
Being stuck in the middle of a huge traffic jam just south of Amsterdam is no fun, especially when ... »
Running in the cold
Most people of sound mind would find it extremely difficult to understand that inner urge of mine which keeps ... »